After the Social Security Administration (SSA) denies a claim for SSDI benefits, claimants have specific legal pathways they can pursue.
These primarily include initiating an SSDI lawsuit in federal court or going through hearings before an administrative law judge.
Filing a Lawsuit in Federal Court
When administrative appeals are exhausted, filing a lawsuit in federal court becomes an option.
Claimants usually reach this step if an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), the Appeals Council, and the SSA all deny the claim for disability benefits.
A federal lawsuit is often seen as the last legal tool available in the pursuit of SSDI benefits.
The initiation of a suit must adhere to strict deadlines—claimants have 60 days after the last denial to file their case in court.
The Role of Administrative Law Judges
Administrative Law Judges are at the center of the administrative hearing process for denied SSDI disability claims.
They are different from judges in a personal injury lawsuit because ALJs focus specifically on federal administrative cases involving agencies like the SSA.
An ALJ’s role involves a comprehensive review of a claimant’s case, including evidence and testimony.
Claimants are encouraged to seek professional advice to ensure they are well-prepared for this hearing.
The ALJ’s decision can affirm, reverse, or modify previous determinations made at the SSA level.
The importance of these judges cannot be overstated, as their judgment could be a claimant’s key to receiving Social Security disability benefits.
The SSA’s guidelines provide a clear outline for more information on the appeal process and the role of ALJs.